Skip to main content
Banner image for Lord Lexden OBE

Lord Lexden OBE

Official Historian of the Conservative Party

Main navigation

  • Home
  • About Lord Lexden
  • Articles & Reviews
  • Letters
  • News
  • Parliament
  • Publications
  • Contact

Why do we need change?

  • Tweet
Monday, 27 April, 2020
salisbury

“Change? Why do we need change? Aren’t things bad enough as they are?”

These amusing, reactionary words appear from time to time on the lips of politicians and others, though they can be found nowhere in any dictionary of quotations. Jacob Rees-Mogg, a man much inclined to historical allusions, used them in the Commons on 24 April, attributing them to Palmerston, for which there is no evidence whatsoever.

Nor, on the other hand, is there any firm evidence that they were spoken by the person to whom they are usually attributed, the great Lord Salisbury, Tory Prime Minister for most of the period  from 1885 to 1902 when he resigned on account of old age. Salisbury is by far the better guess, however, as he was much given to expressing fear of change. In 1879 he wrote: “Whatever happens will be for the worse, and therefore it is in our interest that as little should happen as possible”. Conservatives had a duty to postpone change. In 1892 he said: “The use of Conservatism was to delay changes till they become harmless.” This aspect of Salisbury’s political creed is discussed sympathetically in Andrew Roberts’s brilliant biography, Salisbury: Victorian Titan published in 1999.

It is unlikely that the origin of the well-known words will ever be definitely established. This is not uncommon. There is no evidence that Harold Macmillan ever referred to the essence of politics as being the need to respond to “events, dear boy, events.” He may never have said them, but they fit his character. The same can be said of Salisbury and the likelihood that change will make matters worse. Mr Rees-Mogg’s grasp of history is unfortunately often shaky.

  • Recent News

You may also be interested in

grey

When the lamps went out in 1914

Thursday, 14 January, 2021

The analogy between the extinguishing of lamps and the end of peace in 1914 is well-known. It was made by Sir Edward Grey, the Foreign Secretary at the time. He is the subject of a fine new biography. Alistair Lexden’s review of the book is attached.

Show only

  • Articles
  • Recent News
  • Speeches

Image: Lord Salisbury, London Stereoscopic Company - NYPL (Public domain)

Lord Lexden OBE

Footer

  • About RSS
  • Accessibility
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • About Lord Lexden
  • Articles and Reviews
  • Letters
  • Parliament
  • Publications
Promoted by Alan Mabbutt on behalf of Lord Lexden, both at 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9HQ
Copyright 2021 Lord Lexden OBE . All rights reserved.
Powered by Bluetree